<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- If you are running a bot please visit this policy page outlining rules you must respect. http://www.insanejournal.com/bots/ -->
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>urn:lj:insanejournal.com:atom1:moondancer</id>
  <title>Dancing in the Moonlight</title>
  <subtitle>I shall goe into ane hare</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>Moondancer</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://moondancer.insanejournal.com/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="http://moondancer.insanejournal.com/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2008-11-06T08:00:18Z</updated>
  <link rel="service.feed" type="application/x.atom+xml" href="http://moondancer.insanejournal.com/data/atom" title="Dancing in the Moonlight"/>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:lj:insanejournal.com:atom1:moondancer:1276234</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://moondancer.insanejournal.com/1276234.html"/>
    <title>The Pursuit of Happiness</title>
    <published>2008-11-06T07:59:20Z</published>
    <updated>2008-11-06T08:00:18Z</updated>
    <category term="marriage"/>
    <category term="civil rights"/>
    <category term="public post"/>
    <category term="equal protection"/>
    <content type="html">I have often referred to this phrase from the Declaration of Independence in my discussions on marriage equality. In response to comments I made in another journal, someone recently questioned whether or not the Declaration could be used in legal arguments.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; From Wikipedia (that world-renowned source of reliability :D):&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;The phrase "pursuit of happiness" appeared in the 1967 Supreme Court case, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a title="Loving v. Virginia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia"&gt;Loving v. Virginia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), which focused on an anti-&lt;a title="Miscegenation" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miscegenation"&gt;miscegenation&lt;/a&gt; statute. &lt;a title="Earl Warren" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_Warren"&gt;Chief Justice Warren&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;dl&gt; &lt;dd&gt;&lt;i&gt;The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/dd&gt; &lt;/dl&gt; &lt;p&gt;The phrase is used in the depression-era case &lt;i&gt;&lt;a title="Meyer v. Nebraska" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meyer_v._Nebraska"&gt;Meyer v. Nebraska&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, 262 U.S. 390 (1923), which is seen as the seminal case interpreting the "liberty" interest of the &lt;a class="mw-redirect" title="Due Process" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_Process"&gt;Due Process&lt;/a&gt; clause of the &lt;a class="mw-redirect" title="14th amendment" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_amendment"&gt;14th amendment&lt;/a&gt; as guaranteeing, among other things, a right to the pursuit of happiness, and, consequently, a right to privacy.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;If &lt;i&gt;Loving v Virginia&lt;/i&gt; cannot be considered relevant in any question of marriage equality, then I do not know what can be. As a member of the pagan clergy, I fully support the right of any committed, adult&amp;nbsp;persons to engage in the rites of marriage (regardless of gender sexual orientation or, for that matter, number.)&lt;/p&gt;</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
